Author | Message |
Males who frequent prince.org less likely to get laid In a study carried out by five old Chinese men cracking tortoise shells it has been determined that males who visit prince.org are 27% less likely to get laid than the normal test subject males who did not frequent the site.
By method of translating the old Chinese men's finding into English based on picking out particular Chinese words which kinda sounded like English ones, the conclusions were as follows:
Other findings of interest were:
Please note: For the purpose of this study, sexual relations between male orgers and animals, and any relations between orgers, were dismissed as dirty and unhealthy. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: By method of translating the old Chinese men's finding into English based on picking out particular Chinese words which kinda sounded like English ones...
sounds reasonable Vanglorious... this is protected by the red, the black, and the green. With a key... sissy! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I was just about to post exactly the same report! What are the chances eh? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RocknRollisalive said: I was just about to post exactly the same report! What are the chances eh? so what do u think? Were my findings accurate compared to your equally well researched report? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: RocknRollisalive said: I was just about to post exactly the same report! What are the chances eh? so what do u think? Were my findings accurate compared to your equally well researched report? Uncannily so... Although I would say my POOK VS ALTHOM STATISTIC WAS A LITTLE MORE EVENLY BALANCED | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RocknRollisalive said: Fauxie said: so what do u think? Were my findings accurate compared to your equally well researched report? Uncannily so... Although I would say my POOK VS ALTHOM STATISTIC WAS A LITTLE MORE EVENLY BALANCED In that case, I'd have to call into question the reliability of your statistics, but this is the beauty of a serious discussion of a serious topic. We can all learn something from threads like this. I truly am a genius. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: We can all learn something from threads like this. I truly am a genius.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I have know clue who you people are, or where you got this scandalous data.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBomb777 said: I have know clue who you people are, or where you got this scandalous data.
Morning! Nice to meet ya! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBomb777 said: I have know clue who you people are, or where you got this scandalous data.
Hello. I am a sage of sorts. The crap sort. I think u should make a decision. Either come out, or declare yourself a raging heterosexual with a terribly chauvinistic thread about tits and arse, or alternatively just declare yourself omnisexual like me and claim you can have sex with anything you want anytime time you want simply because of your overwhelming power of charisma! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RocknRollisalive said: AsianBomb777 said: I have know clue who you people are, or where you got this scandalous data.
Morning! Nice to meet ya! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBomb777 said: RocknRollisalive said: Morning! Nice to meet ya! Indeed | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: AsianBomb777 said: I have know clue who you people are, or where you got this scandalous data.
Hello. I am a sage of sorts. The crap sort. I think u should make a decision. Either come out, or declare yourself a raging heterosexual with a terribly chauvinistic thread about tits and arse, or alternatively just declare yourself omnisexual like me and claim you can have sex with anything you want anytime time you want simply because of your overwhelming power of charisma! I don't like those catagories. They're too specific, and I can't recall any tits and arse posts. I prefer the raging gay man in a gay man's body--it seems more fitting for male Prince fans on the org. What's this thread about again? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBomb777 said: Fauxie said: Hello. I am a sage of sorts. The crap sort. I think u should make a decision. Either come out, or declare yourself a raging heterosexual with a terribly chauvinistic thread about tits and arse, or alternatively just declare yourself omnisexual like me and claim you can have sex with anything you want anytime time you want simply because of your overwhelming power of charisma! I don't like those catagories. They're too specific, and I can't recall any tits and arse posts. I prefer the raging gay man in a gay man's body--it seems more fitting for male Prince fans on the org. What's this thread about again? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBomb777 said: Fauxie said: Hello. I am a sage of sorts. The crap sort. I think u should make a decision. Either come out, or declare yourself a raging heterosexual with a terribly chauvinistic thread about tits and arse, or alternatively just declare yourself omnisexual like me and claim you can have sex with anything you want anytime time you want simply because of your overwhelming power of charisma! I don't like those catagories. They're too specific, and I can't recall any tits and arse posts. I prefer the raging gay man in a gay man's body--it seems more fitting for male Prince fans on the org. What's this thread about again? Thread subject is not important. It's like wise old people once said, it's not about where you go to, but where you were trying to get to when you were on your way to going where you went. And yes, categories are rather arbitary. Who could possibly account for you? ... [Edited 1/4/05 5:23am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: In a study carried out by five old Chinese men cracking tortoise shells it has been determined that males who visit prince.org are 27% less likely to get laid than the normal test subject males who did not frequent the site.
By method of translating the old Chinese men's finding into English based on picking out particular Chinese words which kinda sounded like English ones, the conclusions were as follows:
Other findings of interest were:
Please note: For the purpose of this study, sexual relations between male orgers and animals, and any relations between orgers, were dismissed as dirty and unhealthy. lol... was this study conducted within a scope of only those that frequent the net in general vs. those that went to the org....or all men vs. those that frequent the org? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: AsianBomb777 said: I have know clue who you people are, or where you got this scandalous data.
Hello. I am a sage of sorts. The crap sort. I think u should make a decision. Either come out, or declare yourself a raging heterosexual with a terribly chauvinistic thread about tits and arse, or alternatively just declare yourself omnisexual like me and claim you can have sex with anything you want anytime time you want simply because of your overwhelming power of charisma! fauxie baby, you HAVE to declare yoruself omnisexual to BE sexual i mean...that tastey lookin mango that has that big hole in it doesn't look so tastey anymore knowing how you took advantage of the poor innocent thing perve | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cuntroversial said: Fauxie said: In a study carried out by five old Chinese men cracking tortoise shells it has been determined that males who visit prince.org are 27% less likely to get laid than the normal test subject males who did not frequent the site.
By method of translating the old Chinese men's finding into English based on picking out particular Chinese words which kinda sounded like English ones, the conclusions were as follows:
Other findings of interest were:
Please note: For the purpose of this study, sexual relations between male orgers and animals, and any relations between orgers, were dismissed as dirty and unhealthy. lol... was this study conducted within a scope of only those that frequent the net in general vs. those that went to the org....or all men vs. those that frequent the org? Juxtaposed against those that don't frequent prince.org, rather than the web in general. We already know that access to the internet corrupts males. The five old Chinese men proved this 3 years ago. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cuntroversial said: Fauxie said: Hello. I am a sage of sorts. The crap sort. I think u should make a decision. Either come out, or declare yourself a raging heterosexual with a terribly chauvinistic thread about tits and arse, or alternatively just declare yourself omnisexual like me and claim you can have sex with anything you want anytime time you want simply because of your overwhelming power of charisma! fauxie baby, you HAVE to declare yoruself omnisexual to BE sexual i mean...that tastey lookin mango that has that big hole in it doesn't look so tastey anymore knowing how you took advantage of the poor innocent thing perve I have no idea what you're talking about. Ok, so I've contacted a lawyer, but still, I am certain any mango I have ever had relations with will be willing to testify that it did so willingly and was of consentual age at the time. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: cuntroversial said: lol... was this study conducted within a scope of only those that frequent the net in general vs. those that went to the org....or all men vs. those that frequent the org? Juxtaposed against those that don't frequent prince.org, rather than the web in general. We already know that access to the internet corrupts males. The five old Chinese men proved this 3 years ago. lol i was gonna say...if it were gainst men in general i'd think your numbers were far too low lol...but just against those that are online but NOT orgers...they sound about right | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm not intelligent enough to understand any of this esoteric psuedo-sexual banter, so as / usual I'll log off, and go & boff the wifes brains out. 'Tiz all I understand U C Then I'll do the cat,
the dog, and have another go at the parrot; he's almost wooed, a few more crackers and i'll have him 4 sure. Logging back on I'll find more incomprehensible proverbs to stimulate an orgy of frustration and sexual tension ; releasing again as I logg-out and boffing anything in site. "The theory of ORGasm is forever renewing in it's angst against the intelligenitalia." ( The Three Wise Monkey's ) ~PClinuxOS~ I've been here longer than I care to remember, ... I drop in from time to time, ... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: RocknRollisalive said: Uncannily so... Although I would say my POOK VS ALTHOM STATISTIC WAS A LITTLE MORE EVENLY BALANCED In that case, I'd have to call into question the reliability of your statistics, but this is the beauty of a serious discussion of a serious topic. We can all learn something from threads like this. I truly am a genius. Faux is a genius! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: Other findings of interest were: [*] POOK HAVE MORE LADY MONKEY IN ONE DAY THAN ALTHOM HAVE DIRTY PIC ON COM. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FLUX said: I'm not intelligent enough to understand any of this esoteric psuedo-sexual banter, so as / usual I'll log off, and go & boff the wifes brains out. 'Tiz all I understand U C Then I'll do the cat,
the dog, and have another go at the parrot; he's almost wooed, a few more crackers and i'll have him 4 sure. Logging back on I'll find more incomprehensible proverbs to stimulate an orgy of frustration and sexual tension ; releasing again as I logg-out and boffing anything in site. "The theory of ORGasm is forever renewing in it's angst against the intelligenitalia." ( The Three Wise Monkey's ) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
All I know is I took their wallets when they weren't looking.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |