independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Males who frequent prince.org less likely to get laid
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 01/04/05 1:01am

Fauxie

Males who frequent prince.org less likely to get laid

In a study carried out by five old Chinese men cracking tortoise shells it has been determined that males who visit prince.org are 27% less likely to get laid than the normal test subject males who did not frequent the site.

By method of translating the old Chinese men's finding into English based on picking out particular Chinese words which kinda sounded like English ones, the conclusions were as follows:


  • Over a 2 week period male orgers washed 16% less frequently than the test subjects.
  • Male orgers who did manage to have intercourse performed 38% worse than the test subjects (which one assumes lessened the possibility of repeat occurances). This despite male orgers demonstrating a 69% superior ability to articulate their own sexual prowess.


Other findings of interest were:


  • POOK HAVE MORE LADY MONKEY IN ONE DAY THAN ALTHOM HAVE DIRTY PIC ON COM.

  • AsianBoi777 is a gay man in a gay man's body.


Please note: For the purpose of this study, sexual relations between male orgers and animals, and any relations between orgers, were dismissed as dirty and unhealthy.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 01/04/05 1:24am

Dancelot

avatar

Fauxie said:

By method of translating the old Chinese men's finding into English based on picking out particular Chinese words which kinda sounded like English ones...


sounds reasonable lol
Vanglorious... this is protected by the red, the black, and the green. With a key... sissy!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 01/04/05 2:26am

RocknRollisali
ve

omg


I was just about to post exactly the same report!


What are the chances eh?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 01/04/05 4:41am

Fauxie

RocknRollisalive said:

omg


I was just about to post exactly the same report!


What are the chances eh?



lol so what do u think? Were my findings accurate compared to your equally well researched report?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 01/04/05 4:47am

RocknRollisali
ve

Fauxie said:

RocknRollisalive said:

omg


I was just about to post exactly the same report!


What are the chances eh?



lol so what do u think? Were my findings accurate compared to your equally well researched report?


nod

Uncannily so...

Although I would say my POOK VS ALTHOM STATISTIC WAS A LITTLE MORE EVENLY BALANCED
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 01/04/05 4:52am

Fauxie

RocknRollisalive said:

Fauxie said:




lol so what do u think? Were my findings accurate compared to your equally well researched report?


nod

Uncannily so...

Although I would say my POOK VS ALTHOM STATISTIC WAS A LITTLE MORE EVENLY BALANCED


In that case, I'd have to call into question the reliability of your statistics, but this is the beauty of a serious discussion of a serious topic. We can all learn something from threads like this. I truly am a genius.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 01/04/05 4:56am

RocknRollisali
ve

Fauxie said:

We can all learn something from threads like this. I truly am a genius.



worship
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 01/04/05 4:56am

AsianBomb777

I have know clue who you people are, or where you got this scandalous data.

rolleyes
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 01/04/05 4:58am

RocknRollisali
ve

AsianBomb777 said:

I have know clue who you people are, or where you got this scandalous data.

rolleyes



wave

Morning! Nice to meet ya!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 01/04/05 5:03am

Fauxie

AsianBomb777 said:

I have know clue who you people are, or where you got this scandalous data.

rolleyes



Hello. wave I am a sage of sorts. The crap sort. I think u should make a decision. Either come out, or declare yourself a raging heterosexual with a terribly chauvinistic thread about tits and arse, or alternatively just declare yourself omnisexual like me and claim you can have sex with anything you want anytime time you want simply because of your overwhelming power of charisma!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 01/04/05 5:08am

AsianBomb777

RocknRollisalive said:

AsianBomb777 said:

I have know clue who you people are, or where you got this scandalous data.

rolleyes



wave

Morning! Nice to meet ya!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 01/04/05 5:09am

RocknRollisali
ve

AsianBomb777 said:

RocknRollisalive said:




wave

Morning! Nice to meet ya!




Indeed cool
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 01/04/05 5:09am

AsianBomb777

Fauxie said:

AsianBomb777 said:

I have know clue who you people are, or where you got this scandalous data.

rolleyes



Hello. wave I am a sage of sorts. The crap sort. I think u should make a decision. Either come out, or declare yourself a raging heterosexual with a terribly chauvinistic thread about tits and arse, or alternatively just declare yourself omnisexual like me and claim you can have sex with anything you want anytime time you want simply because of your overwhelming power of charisma!



I don't like those catagories. They're too specific, and I can't recall any tits and arse posts.

I prefer the raging gay man in a gay man's body--it seems more fitting for male Prince fans on the org.

What's this thread about again?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 01/04/05 5:20am

JDINTERACTIVE

AsianBomb777 said:

Fauxie said:




Hello. wave I am a sage of sorts. The crap sort. I think u should make a decision. Either come out, or declare yourself a raging heterosexual with a terribly chauvinistic thread about tits and arse, or alternatively just declare yourself omnisexual like me and claim you can have sex with anything you want anytime time you want simply because of your overwhelming power of charisma!



I don't like those catagories. They're too specific, and I can't recall any tits and arse posts.

I prefer the raging gay man in a gay man's body--it seems more fitting for male Prince fans on the org.

What's this thread about again?


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 01/04/05 5:22am

Fauxie

AsianBomb777 said:

Fauxie said:




Hello. wave I am a sage of sorts. The crap sort. I think u should make a decision. Either come out, or declare yourself a raging heterosexual with a terribly chauvinistic thread about tits and arse, or alternatively just declare yourself omnisexual like me and claim you can have sex with anything you want anytime time you want simply because of your overwhelming power of charisma!



I don't like those catagories. They're too specific, and I can't recall any tits and arse posts.

I prefer the raging gay man in a gay man's body--it seems more fitting for male Prince fans on the org.

What's this thread about again?


Thread subject is not important. It's like wise old people once said, it's not about where you go to, but where you were trying to get to when you were on your way to going where you went.

And yes, categories are rather arbitary. Who could possibly account for you? smile

...
[Edited 1/4/05 5:23am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 01/04/05 5:25am

cuntroversial

Fauxie said:

In a study carried out by five old Chinese men cracking tortoise shells it has been determined that males who visit prince.org are 27% less likely to get laid than the normal test subject males who did not frequent the site.

By method of translating the old Chinese men's finding into English based on picking out particular Chinese words which kinda sounded like English ones, the conclusions were as follows:


  • Over a 2 week period male orgers washed 16% less frequently than the test subjects.
  • Male orgers who did manage to have intercourse performed 38% worse than the test subjects (which one assumes lessened the possibility of repeat occurances). This despite male orgers demonstrating a 69% superior ability to articulate their own sexual prowess.


Other findings of interest were:


  • POOK HAVE MORE LADY MONKEY IN ONE DAY THAN ALTHOM HAVE DIRTY PIC ON COM.

  • AsianBoi777 is a gay man in a gay man's body.


Please note: For the purpose of this study, sexual relations between male orgers and animals, and any relations between orgers, were dismissed as dirty and unhealthy.


lol... was this study conducted within a scope of only those that frequent the net in general vs. those that went to the org....or all men vs. those that frequent the org? falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 01/04/05 5:29am

cuntroversial

Fauxie said:

AsianBomb777 said:

I have know clue who you people are, or where you got this scandalous data.

rolleyes



Hello. wave I am a sage of sorts. The crap sort. I think u should make a decision. Either come out, or declare yourself a raging heterosexual with a terribly chauvinistic thread about tits and arse, or alternatively just declare yourself omnisexual like me and claim you can have sex with anything you want anytime time you want simply because of your overwhelming power of charisma!



fauxie baby, you HAVE to declare yoruself omnisexual to BE sexual saw i mean...that tastey lookin mango that has that big hole in it doesn't look so tastey anymore knowing how you took advantage of the poor innocent thing


perve smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 01/04/05 5:42am

Fauxie

cuntroversial said:

Fauxie said:

In a study carried out by five old Chinese men cracking tortoise shells it has been determined that males who visit prince.org are 27% less likely to get laid than the normal test subject males who did not frequent the site.

By method of translating the old Chinese men's finding into English based on picking out particular Chinese words which kinda sounded like English ones, the conclusions were as follows:


  • Over a 2 week period male orgers washed 16% less frequently than the test subjects.
  • Male orgers who did manage to have intercourse performed 38% worse than the test subjects (which one assumes lessened the possibility of repeat occurances). This despite male orgers demonstrating a 69% superior ability to articulate their own sexual prowess.


Other findings of interest were:


  • POOK HAVE MORE LADY MONKEY IN ONE DAY THAN ALTHOM HAVE DIRTY PIC ON COM.

  • AsianBoi777 is a gay man in a gay man's body.


Please note: For the purpose of this study, sexual relations between male orgers and animals, and any relations between orgers, were dismissed as dirty and unhealthy.


lol... was this study conducted within a scope of only those that frequent the net in general vs. those that went to the org....or all men vs. those that frequent the org? falloff



Juxtaposed against those that don't frequent prince.org, rather than the web in general. We already know that access to the internet corrupts males. smile The five old Chinese men proved this 3 years ago.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 01/04/05 5:46am

Fauxie

cuntroversial said:

Fauxie said:




Hello. wave I am a sage of sorts. The crap sort. I think u should make a decision. Either come out, or declare yourself a raging heterosexual with a terribly chauvinistic thread about tits and arse, or alternatively just declare yourself omnisexual like me and claim you can have sex with anything you want anytime time you want simply because of your overwhelming power of charisma!



fauxie baby, you HAVE to declare yoruself omnisexual to BE sexual saw i mean...that tastey lookin mango that has that big hole in it doesn't look so tastey anymore knowing how you took advantage of the poor innocent thing


perve smile


I have no idea what you're talking about. Ok, so I've contacted a lawyer, but still, I am certain any mango I have ever had relations with will be willing to testify that it did so willingly and was of consentual age at the time. neutral
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 01/04/05 6:13am

cuntroversial

Fauxie said:

cuntroversial said:



lol... was this study conducted within a scope of only those that frequent the net in general vs. those that went to the org....or all men vs. those that frequent the org? falloff



Juxtaposed against those that don't frequent prince.org, rather than the web in general. We already know that access to the internet corrupts males. smile The five old Chinese men proved this 3 years ago.



lol i was gonna say...if it were gainst men in general i'd think your numbers were far too low lol...but just against those that are online but NOT orgers...they sound about right evillol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 01/04/05 8:36am

FLUX

avatar

I'm not intelligent enough to understand any of this esoteric psuedo-sexual banter, so as / usual I'll log off, and go & boff the wifes brains out. 'Tiz all I understand U C boff Then I'll do the cat,neko
the dog, and have another go at the parrot; he's almost wooed, a few more crackers and i'll have him 4 sure.booty!
priest pig2 fish
Logging back on I'll find more incomprehensible proverbs to stimulate an orgy of frustration and sexual tension ; releasing again as I logg-out and boffing anything in site.
"The theory of ORGasm is forever renewing in it's angst against the intelligenitalia." ( The Three Wise Monkey's ) 3some
~PClinuxOS~ yes I've been here longer than I care to remember, ... I drop in from time to time, ... thumbs up!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 01/04/05 9:37am

Dreamrockin

Fauxie said:

RocknRollisalive said:



nod

Uncannily so...

Although I would say my POOK VS ALTHOM STATISTIC WAS A LITTLE MORE EVENLY BALANCED


In that case, I'd have to call into question the reliability of your statistics, but this is the beauty of a serious discussion of a serious topic. We can all learn something from threads like this. I truly am a genius.



Faux is a genius! woot!
FKA rockininreno

www.clubnuvo.com
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 01/04/05 1:35pm

althom

avatar

Fauxie said:


Other findings of interest were:


[*] POOK HAVE MORE LADY MONKEY IN ONE DAY THAN ALTHOM HAVE DIRTY PIC ON COM.

eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 01/04/05 5:39pm

AsianBomb777

FLUX said:

I'm not intelligent enough to understand any of this esoteric psuedo-sexual banter, so as / usual I'll log off, and go & boff the wifes brains out. 'Tiz all I understand U C boff Then I'll do the cat,neko
the dog, and have another go at the parrot; he's almost wooed, a few more crackers and i'll have him 4 sure.booty!
priest pig2 fish
Logging back on I'll find more incomprehensible proverbs to stimulate an orgy of frustration and sexual tension ; releasing again as I logg-out and boffing anything in site.
"The theory of ORGasm is forever renewing in it's angst against the intelligenitalia." ( The Three Wise Monkey's ) 3some

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 01/04/05 5:41pm

subhuman09

All I know is I took their wallets when they weren't looking.

biggrin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Males who frequent prince.org less likely to get laid