independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Wed 3rd Dec 2008 9:22pm
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > Priest Comes out and says no on 8
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
Add a reply to this topic   Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
AuthorMessage
Thread started 10/06/08 8:59pm

ehuffnsd

avatar

Priest Comes out and says no on 8

10/5/2008 Fresno, CA, USA (KFSN) -- Father Geoffrey Farrow of the Saint Paul Newman Center in northeast Fresno shocked parishioners Sunday morning when he came out against Proposition 8, an initiative that would eliminate the right for same sex couples to marry in California.
After 23 years as an ordained Catholic Priest, Father Geoffrey Farrow has likely given his final mass. Sunday morning he invited us to hear his message, a message that shocked many parishioners.
11 o'clock mass began as usual Sunday. Father Geoff led parishioners through prayer and communion.
The homily taught of acceptance, love and rejection. But it was his closing remarks that left some parishioners stunned. "What most Catholics hear about being gay or lesbian at their parish is silence
Fr. Geoff says after numerous inquiries from parishioners asking for direction on Proposition 8, if passed would ban gay marriage, the Father said he must go against the Bishops recommendation and instead go with what he feels is right.
"In directing the faithful to vote yes on proposition 8, the California Bishops are not only entering the political arena, they are ignoring the advances and insights of neurology, psychology and the very statements by the church itself that homosexual is innate," says Fr. Geoff.
The priest acknowledges his controversial comments will have consequences. "I know that these words of truth will cost me dearly. But to withhold them would be far more costly and I would become an accomplice to a moral evil that strips gay and lesbian couples, not only of their civil rights but of their human dignity as well."
We sat down with Father Geoff before mass, and he answered the question many are probably wondering... Is he gay? "It's a secondary issue. But yes, I am. And when I was a boy I asked God please make me normal and the prayer never got answered and I realized why. Because God would've made somebody else he wouldn't have made me."
Sunday mass ended with about half the congregation giving a standing ovation. Outside parishioners had mixed reaction about the priest's remarks.
Esmeralda Gonzalez, Parishioner, says "My reaction was extremely shocking I believe that as the body of Christ and as being Catholics we are made to follow by commandments. And God made it to be Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve."
Joshua De La Cerda, Parishioner, says "This is something Jesus would have done, or Christ would have done, spoke out for the truth."
Fr. Geoff said after months of struggling with what to do, said in the end he followed his heart. "In any event regardless of what I or anyone else does in their life, one day you die, and on that day were you true to your conscience, were you true to what you believe. And I think that's the question each of us has to answer. If the answer is no, hell already began before you died."
The parish is clearly divided over this controversy. A few parishioners left in tears.
We contacted Bishop John Steinbock, the head of the Diocese of Fresno this afternoon. He said he has not talked to Father Geoff Farrow, only has heard rumors about what happened today. He told us Proposition 8 is not a homosexuality issue rather about the institution of marriage which is the basis of our society.

http://abclocal.go.com/kf...id=6431105

Fight H8 Join the Impact Light up the Night
12/20/08
http://jointheimpact.wetpaint.com/
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 10/06/08 9:09pm

Stymie

clapping

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 10/06/08 10:04pm

June7

Moderator

avatar

moderator

OMG... this man has given up everything to follow his convictions. touched

That doesn't happen often... God bless him. clapping

I want that Off the Wall, I-don't-really-wanna-stop-till-I-get-enough kind of love!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 10/06/08 10:17pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

Same stand I had to take with my family.
I'd rather stand before God honestly than lie to please man.

Meanwhile, civic knowledge is enhanced by discussing public affairs, taking part in civic activities and reading about current events and history, the group said.


Which is why we have P & R!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 10/06/08 10:24pm

DiminutiveRock
er

avatar

June7 said:

OMG... this man has given up everything to follow his convictions. touched

That doesn't happen often... God bless him. clapping


worship

"I think one of the things that we're probably proudest of -- I certainly am -- is that the message was always love, in any form we portrayed it." - Paul McCartney
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 10/06/08 11:02pm

meow85

avatar

ehuffnsd said:



Esmeralda Gonzalez, Parishioner, says "My reaction was extremely shocking I believe that as the body of Christ and as being Catholics we are made to follow by commandments. And God made it to be Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve."



clapping Thanks for posting this, ehuff. And thank you, Father Geoff, for doing this. Standing up for what you believe and for what is right can be hard to do. This was bravery.

As for the comments of this parishoner? Nothing but the comments of someone who's failed to realize there is nothing in the Commandments that speaks of marriage or sexuality, and apparently not bright enough to avoid tired cliches.

It's not that The Joker's gay. What he is, is Batsexual. He'd be whacking it to Batsy whether our hero had girl parts or boy parts underneath that rubber. batman
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 10/06/08 11:08pm

evenstar3

avatar

god, he's amazing. that takes unbelievable courage.

All Americans, no matter their race, no matter their sex, no matter their sexual orientation, should have that same freedom to marry - Mildred Loving
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 10/07/08 12:12am

PANDURITO

avatar

ehuffnsd said:

10/5/2008 Fresno, CA, USA (KFSN) -- Father Geoffrey Farrow of the Saint Paul Newman Center in northeast Fresno ...

Saint Paul Newman Center? omfg

whistling
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 10/07/08 3:26am

razor

Great act of humanity and bravery. It takes courage, intellect and great awareness to reject ingrained dogma and prejudice, and instead recognise reality. This man should run for office if the bigots sack him..

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 10/07/08 3:55am

PANDURITO

avatar

ehuffnsd said:

Joshua De La Cerda, Parishioner, says "This is something Jesus would have done, or Christ would have done, spoke out for the truth."

whistling
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 10/07/08 4:23am

XxAxX

avatar

woot! stand up and be counted, america!

ufo
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 10/07/08 6:24am

evenstar3

avatar

PANDURITO said:

ehuffnsd said:

Joshua De La Cerda, Parishioner, says "This is something Jesus would have done, or Christ would have done, spoke out for the truth."



rolleyes

All Americans, no matter their race, no matter their sex, no matter their sexual orientation, should have that same freedom to marry - Mildred Loving
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 10/07/08 9:34am

HiinEnkelte

avatar

disbelief

Welcome to the New World Odor and
the Myth Making Moonbattery of Obamanation.

DISSENT FROM DAY ONE

Pround member of the .org conservative union
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 10/07/08 10:26am

IrresistibleB1
tch

avatar

clapping that took tremendous courage.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 10/07/08 3:43pm

DiminutiveRock
er

avatar

woot!

"I think one of the things that we're probably proudest of -- I certainly am -- is that the message was always love, in any form we portrayed it." - Paul McCartney
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 10/07/08 7:54pm

meow85

avatar

PANDURITO said:

ehuffnsd said:

Joshua De La Cerda, Parishioner, says "This is something Jesus would have done, or Christ would have done, spoke out for the truth."


You doubt Jesus would have stood up for what was right even in the face of religious dogma?

If that's so, you may have been reading about a different man than I've been.

It's not that The Joker's gay. What he is, is Batsexual. He'd be whacking it to Batsy whether our hero had girl parts or boy parts underneath that rubber. batman
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 10/07/08 8:24pm

ehuffnsd

avatar

meow85 said:

PANDURITO said:



You doubt Jesus would have stood up for what was right even in the face of religious dogma?

If that's so, you may have been reading about a different man than I've been.

re read the quote.

it seems to read like the person is saying Jesus and Christ are two different people.

Fight H8 Join the Impact Light up the Night
12/20/08
http://jointheimpact.wetpaint.com/
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 10/07/08 8:49pm

meow85

avatar

ehuffnsd said:

meow85 said:


You doubt Jesus would have stood up for what was right even in the face of religious dogma?

If that's so, you may have been reading about a different man than I've been.

re read the quote.

it seems to read like the person is saying Jesus and Christ are two different people.

Not really. It looks more like simple misspeaking.

Anyways, Christ is a title, not his name. Anyone can be a Christ, so in that sense you could mention Jesus and Christ together and be speaking about two seperate people.

It's not that The Joker's gay. What he is, is Batsexual. He'd be whacking it to Batsy whether our hero had girl parts or boy parts underneath that rubber. batman
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 10/07/08 9:16pm

ehuffnsd

avatar

meow85 said:

ehuffnsd said:


re read the quote.

it seems to read like the person is saying Jesus and Christ are two different people.

Not really. It looks more like simple misspeaking.

Anyways, Christ is a title, not his name. Anyone can be a Christ, so in that sense you could mention Jesus and Christ together and be speaking about two seperate people.

but to a Catholic Christ and Jesus are one in the same.

it's a weird quote i had to read it a couple times myself.


i think pandy was trying to be funny.
[Edited 10/7/08 21:18pm]

Fight H8 Join the Impact Light up the Night
12/20/08
http://jointheimpact.wetpaint.com/
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 10/07/08 9:34pm

FuNkeNsteiN

avatar

HiinEnkelte said:

disbelief

rolleyes


sigh

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 10/07/08 9:49pm

CliffClaven

avatar

I think I will be voting yes on Prop 8. I'm in the group that thinks that homosexuals should have all of the legal rights of a heterosexual couple, but I don't think it should be called "marriage"... am I an asshole because of that? I want visiting rights, etc (name whatever "right" you want - I don't think I would be against it) ... I think those things are important and necessary. I just don't think it should be called "marriage", because it isn't. Am I an asshole? How should I vote? If I vote "yes", are there opportunities to ensure that homosexual couples rights' are equal with heterosexual rights (which I consider equal) while still holding the belief that a "marriage" is between a man and a woman? Can I judge between the love between a man a woman and the love the between a man/woman and a man/woman? I don't think I can - not sure if "society" can think I either.

Drunk edit....
[Edited 10/7/08 21:54pm]

There is one orger who is a COMPLETE RACIST who should be banned from this board but will never be. fart

http://uk.youtube.com/wat...jo85WhbYqM lol
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 10/07/08 9:54pm

evenstar3

avatar

CliffClaven said:

I think I will be voting yes on Prop 8. I'm in the group that thinks that homosexuals should have all of the legal rights of a heterosexual couple, but I don't think it should be called "marriage"... am I an asshole because of that? I want visiting rights, etc (name whatever "right" you want - I don't think I would be against it) ... I think those things are important and necessary. I just don't think it should be called "marriage", because it isn't. Am I an asshole? How should I vote? If I vote "yes", are there opportunities to ensure that homosexual couples rights' are equal with heterosexual rights (which I consider equal) while still holding the belief that a "marriage" is between a man and a woman? Can I judge both the love between a man a woman and the love the between a man/woman and a man/woman? I think I can - not sure if "society" can think I can.

Drunk edit....
[Edited 10/7/08 21:51pm]


and why don't you think it should be called marriage? rolleyes

All Americans, no matter their race, no matter their sex, no matter their sexual orientation, should have that same freedom to marry - Mildred Loving
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 10/07/08 9:57pm

Stymie

CliffClaven said:

I think I will be voting yes on Prop 8. I'm in the group that thinks that homosexuals should have all of the legal rights of a heterosexual couple, but I don't think it should be called "marriage"... am I an asshole because of that? I want visiting rights, etc (name whatever "right" you want - I don't think I would be against it) ... I think those things are important and necessary. I just don't think it should be called "marriage", because it isn't. Am I an asshole? How should I vote? If I vote "yes", are there opportunities to ensure that homosexual couples rights' are equal with heterosexual rights (which I consider equal) while still holding the belief that a "marriage" is between a man and a woman? Can I judge between the love between a man a woman and the love the between a man/woman and a man/woman? I don't think I can - not sure if "society" can think I either.

Drunk edit....
[Edited 10/7/08 21:54pm]
I think gays should be able to call it whatever they want to. If I chose to marry a man, there can be zero religious connotations connected to it and it would still be a marriage.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 10/07/08 10:16pm

noimageatall

avatar

yes



And God made it to be Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve.


I am sooooo sick of this quote. disbelief
Those are made-up names anyway. cool

Racism is like an insidious virus, that no one has a cure for and can't be seen.....it just keeps reinfecting the weakest minds...
http://www.watchtowercomments.com/
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 10/07/08 10:54pm

CliffClaven

avatar

evenstar3 said:

CliffClaven said:

I think I will be voting yes on Prop 8. I'm in the group that thinks that homosexuals should have all of the legal rights of a heterosexual couple, but I don't think it should be called "marriage"... am I an asshole because of that? I want visiting rights, etc (name whatever "right" you want - I don't think I would be against it) ... I think those things are important and necessary. I just don't think it should be called "marriage", because it isn't. Am I an asshole? How should I vote? If I vote "yes", are there opportunities to ensure that homosexual couples rights' are equal with heterosexual rights (which I consider equal) while still holding the belief that a "marriage" is between a man and a woman? Can I judge both the love between a man a woman and the love the between a man/woman and a man/woman? I think I can - not sure if "society" can think I can.

Drunk edit....
[Edited 10/7/08 21:51pm]


and why don't you think it should be called marriage? rolleyes


Thanks for the eyeroll - I answered the question civially and without malice, and I get an eyeroll.... nice.

My personal opinion is that marriage means the union between a man and a woman. I do, however, believe that homosexuals should have the same legal rights in a "civil union" (I am not an expert on what that means). But, I guarantee if you ask me "should a homosexual couple in a civil union have [insert whatever right you want] that married heterosexual couples have", I can't imagine that I would say no. It's just not "marriage" in the definition of the word. It should be more about the rights than the word anyways.

There is one orger who is a COMPLETE RACIST who should be banned from this board but will never be. fart

http://uk.youtube.com/wat...jo85WhbYqM lol
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 10/07/08 11:05pm

evenstar3

avatar

CliffClaven said:

evenstar3 said:



and why don't you think it should be called marriage? rolleyes


Thanks for the eyeroll - I answered the question civially and without malice, and I get an eyeroll.... nice.

My personal opinion is that marriage means the union between a man and a woman. I do, however, believe that homosexuals should have the same legal rights in a "civil union" (I am not an expert on what that means). But, I guarantee if you ask me "should a homosexual couple in a civil union have [insert whatever right you want] that married heterosexual couples have", I can't imagine that I would say no. It's just not "marriage" in the definition of the word. It should be more about the rights than the word anyways.


you're welcome.

and what makes you believe it should only be between a man and a woman?

All Americans, no matter their race, no matter their sex, no matter their sexual orientation, should have that same freedom to marry - Mildred Loving
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 10/07/08 11:16pm

CliffClaven

avatar

evenstar3 said:

CliffClaven said:



Thanks for the eyeroll - I answered the question civially and without malice, and I get an eyeroll.... nice.

My personal opinion is that marriage means the union between a man and a woman. I do, however, believe that homosexuals should have the same legal rights in a "civil union" (I am not an expert on what that means). But, I guarantee if you ask me "should a homosexual couple in a civil union have [insert whatever right you want] that married heterosexual couples have", I can't imagine that I would say no. It's just not "marriage" in the definition of the word. It should be more about the rights than the word anyways.


you're welcome.

and what makes you believe it should only be between a man and a woman?


You're being sarcastic - I wish you weren't, even though we disagree.

I think they should have the same rights, but it's not marriage. Isn't the fight for same rights anyway? I think they should have those. I don't understand where I'm off on this one.

There is one orger who is a COMPLETE RACIST who should be banned from this board but will never be. fart

http://uk.youtube.com/wat...jo85WhbYqM lol
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 10/07/08 11:22pm

meow85

avatar

ehuffnsd said:

meow85 said:


Not really. It looks more like simple misspeaking.

Anyways, Christ is a title, not his name. Anyone can be a Christ, so in that sense you could mention Jesus and Christ together and be speaking about two seperate people.

but to a Catholic Christ and Jesus are one in the same.

it's a weird quote i had to read it a couple times myself.


i think pandy was trying to be funny.
[Edited 10/7/08 21:18pm]



Christ is a title. As it's commonly used it does refer to Jesus. But the word itself simply means "healer", so it can potentially refer to anybody. There's Christ, and then there's Christ.

It's not that The Joker's gay. What he is, is Batsexual. He'd be whacking it to Batsy whether our hero had girl parts or boy parts underneath that rubber. batman
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 10/07/08 11:26pm

meow85

avatar

CliffClaven said:

I think I will be voting yes on Prop 8. I'm in the group that thinks that homosexuals should have all of the legal rights of a heterosexual couple, but I don't think it should be called "marriage"... am I an asshole because of that? I want visiting rights, etc (name whatever "right" you want - I don't think I would be against it) ... I think those things are important and necessary. I just don't think it should be called "marriage", because it isn't. Am I an asshole? How should I vote? If I vote "yes", are there opportunities to ensure that homosexual couples rights' are equal with heterosexual rights (which I consider equal) while still holding the belief that a "marriage" is between a man and a woman? Can I judge between the love between a man a woman and the love the between a man/woman and a man/woman? I don't think I can - not sure if "society" can think I either.

Drunk edit....
[Edited 10/7/08 21:54pm]


Why shouldn't it be called marriage?

Marriage historically is a legal agreement. Nothing more, nothing less. We've already changed the meaning innumerable times, including to the current one of a love-match between a man and a woman as approved by God and/or a judge.

So if a heterosexual couple can call their bond a marriage even if it wasn't performed by a religious cleric, then why can't a same-sex couple do the same? Is there a valid reason to deny the title of marriage besides sentimentalizing a word that's meaning has already been altered and changed?

It's not that The Joker's gay. What he is, is Batsexual. He'd be whacking it to Batsy whether our hero had girl parts or boy parts underneath that rubber. batman
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 10/07/08 11:30pm

meow85

avatar

CliffClaven said:

evenstar3 said:



you're welcome.

and what makes you believe it should only be between a man and a woman?


You're being sarcastic - I wish you weren't, even though we disagree.

I think they should have the same rights, but it's not marriage. Isn't the fight for same rights anyway? I think they should have those. I don't understand where I'm off on this one.

It is mainly about the fight for equal rights, but it doesn't stop there.

Marriage is a signifier of status and social respectability. It really shouldn't be, but it is and that's the angle behind the fight for use of the word. What does it say when we essentially say same-sex couples can have the legal, on-paper rights of a marriage, but disallow them the honour of calling it one?

It's not that The Joker's gay. What he is, is Batsexual. He'd be whacking it to Batsy whether our hero had girl parts or boy parts underneath that rubber. batman
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
Add a reply to this topic   Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > Priest Comes out and says no on 8