I heard a Sarah Palin rumor that I don't know if it's true...

you know how Sarah Palin has a special needs child? There are no pictures of her pregnant with her last child? Rumor has it, that her infant child is actually her 17 yr old daughter's child. vEry interesting????

Sarah Palin heard that rumor, too. She wanted to address it, and her choices were:

1. Present birth certificate showing she is the mother;
2. Present delivering doctors/nurses, who could confirm they delivered a baby from Sarah;
3. Present documents from the hospital, which would confirm Sarah was admitted to give birth;
4. Present documents from doctor visits during the pregnancy, confirming Sarah was pregnant; or
5. Reveal that unmarried teenage daughter is pregnant and couldn't possibly be Trig's mother.

Any good mother would have gone with 1 - 4, but we're talking about Sarah Palin here.

She went with #5.

Sarah is the mother. The REAL question is - who's the father?

I think that's why Sarah didn't go with option #1 above, which was the easiest and most efficient way to put the "Is Bristol Trig's Mom?" rumor to bed.

That doesn't prove the daughter is not the mother of Supposedly sarah's youngest child. The baby is old enough that sarah's daughter could of had the baby at 16?

jaimestarr79 said:

there were pictures of Palin pregnant, i remember seeing them.

this is not important.

Focusing on the scurrilous rumors only makes Palin look better, in my view. It makes her seem sympathetic to many people who feel she is unfairly attacked by the media.

To me, it would be much better to just focus on Palin's official version of the story, the one in which she negligently and selfishly endangers the life of her unborn child by delaying treatment for nearly 24 hours. Then she and her supporters try to pass that negligence off as some kind of heroism or fortitude, when in fact it is shockingly dangerous and shows how pathetically stupid she is.

Efan said: