independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Marques Houston.. Naked banned from BET
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 6 of 6 <123456
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #150 posted 06/02/05 3:56pm

TheOrgerFormer
lyKnownAs

GlitterStream said:

anon said:

WHO makes a song for the "bi"? I don't buy into that whole thing. People that claim to be bi are just greedy.
They don't need a song.


clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping
Come on now. Why can't we have a song for us? God knows there are plenty enough songs for the 'straights'. Plus, bi people are not greedy. We're some of the best people you'll ever know.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #151 posted 06/02/05 4:20pm

GlitterStream

avatar

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

GlitterStream said:



clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping clapping
Come on now. Why can't we have a song for us? God knows there are plenty enough songs for the 'straights'. Plus, bi people are not greedy. We're some of the best people you'll ever know.


Oh nigga please. Ya'll mufuckers is GRE-fuckin-EDY. And i don't believe more than half of ya'll.
Who's gonna stop 200 Balloons?
YO MAMA!!
LET'S DO IT!!!
(funky geetaw solo)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #152 posted 06/02/05 4:22pm

sextonseven

avatar

GlitterStream said:

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

Come on now. Why can't we have a song for us? God knows there are plenty enough songs for the 'straights'. Plus, bi people are not greedy. We're some of the best people you'll ever know.


Oh nigga please. Ya'll mufuckers is GRE-fuckin-EDY. And i don't believe more than half of ya'll.


Sounds like sour grapes to me.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #153 posted 06/02/05 4:48pm

GlitterStream

avatar

sextonseven said:

GlitterStream said:



Oh nigga please. Ya'll mufuckers is GRE-fuckin-EDY. And i don't believe more than half of ya'll.


Sounds like sour grapes to me.


about....
Who's gonna stop 200 Balloons?
YO MAMA!!
LET'S DO IT!!!
(funky geetaw solo)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #154 posted 06/02/05 4:53pm

TheOrgerFormer
lyKnownAs

GlitterStream said:

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

Come on now. Why can't we have a song for us? God knows there are plenty enough songs for the 'straights'. Plus, bi people are not greedy. We're some of the best people you'll ever know.


Oh nigga please. Ya'll mufuckers is GRE-fuckin-EDY. And i don't believe more than half of ya'll.
How are we greedy? lol And what do you mean that you don't believe more than half of us?


Wait a minute....I just realized I don't give a fuck. Carry on. biggrin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #155 posted 06/02/05 4:58pm

GlitterStream

avatar

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

GlitterStream said:



Oh nigga please. Ya'll mufuckers is GRE-fuckin-EDY. And i don't believe more than half of ya'll.
How are we greedy? lol And what do you mean that you don't believe more than half of us?


Wait a minute....I just realized I don't give a fuck. Carry on. biggrin



I'm not getting into this. "Bi-sexuals" don't exist. End of story. Period.
Who's gonna stop 200 Balloons?
YO MAMA!!
LET'S DO IT!!!
(funky geetaw solo)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #156 posted 06/02/05 5:03pm

TheOrgerFormer
lyKnownAs

GlitterStream said:

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

How are we greedy? lol And what do you mean that you don't believe more than half of us?


Wait a minute....I just realized I don't give a fuck. Carry on. biggrin



I'm not getting into this. "Bi-sexuals" don't exist. End of story. Period.
That's some funny shit right there. lol

Glitter, which re-user are you? wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #157 posted 06/02/05 5:09pm

GlitterStream

avatar

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

GlitterStream said:




I'm not getting into this. "Bi-sexuals" don't exist. End of story. Period.
That's some funny shit right there. lol

Glitter, which re-user are you? wink


what?

Who's gonna stop 200 Balloons?
YO MAMA!!
LET'S DO IT!!!
(funky geetaw solo)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #158 posted 06/02/05 5:22pm

TheOrgerFormer
lyKnownAs

GlitterStream said:

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

That's some funny shit right there. lol

Glitter, which re-user are you? wink


what?

I just want to know who I'm talking to. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #159 posted 06/02/05 5:25pm

GlitterStream

avatar

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

GlitterStream said:



what?

I just want to know who I'm talking to. wink


Your username is GlitterStream.

Your membership level is member, and you've been a registered user for 1 month 3 days.

You visit the site an average of 29.0 times/week.

You've posted in the forums 347 times, and entered the chat room 1 times.

You have sent 23 orgNotes, and received 29 (a 1:1.3 ratio.)

Blood Type: A-

anything else?
Who's gonna stop 200 Balloons?
YO MAMA!!
LET'S DO IT!!!
(funky geetaw solo)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #160 posted 06/02/05 5:34pm

TheOrgerFormer
lyKnownAs

Whatever dude.lol ain't no way you just started posting outta the blue on the Org a few months ago.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #161 posted 06/02/05 5:35pm

GlitterStream

avatar

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

Whatever dude.lol ain't no way you just started posting outta the blue on the Org a few months ago.


What are you talking about? I just joined last month. Eveybody thinks i'm GlamSlamKid, but i'm not. I don't get it.
Who's gonna stop 200 Balloons?
YO MAMA!!
LET'S DO IT!!!
(funky geetaw solo)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #162 posted 06/06/05 1:26pm

TurnItUp

JANFAN4L said:

Janfriend said:



It was about bisexuality. She had said many times that she wanted to stay true to the song and not change the words, so she kept "girl" until the end when she says "boy." The whole song is about a girl until the very last line when she says "boy." In interviews she said she knew people who were gay and bisexual and that it was their reality and wanted to do a song for them. If it was about a threesome, she would have gone back and forth between boy and girl throughout the song. She would have been more explicit and clear


nod I do recall this interview.

Ok that answer makes more sense then the last one you made, but this is just my opinion I think she's singing about her own experiences, not saying that she doesn't have friends or acquantances that are like that. No she didn't go back and forth in the song, stead she keeps singing about a girl and then at the end changes to a boy. All I'm saying is if I don't go that way I DEFINITELY would've changed the line to boy instead of girl. When Rod Stewart was singing it he was a guy singing a song about a woman. Janet is a woman that should've been singing the song to a man.

Here's a prime example: For years people have speculated that Luther Vandross is gay, put he has never denied it or confirmed it. On his album titled Songs (a compilation of cover songs)he sang "All the Woman I Need" remaking Whitney Houston's All the Man that I Need. He could've left the song alone and kept it Man that I need, but he didn't he changed it to Woman. Same thing with Whitney folks have speculated over and over that she is a lesbian, but is she singing All the Woman, No, she said Man. Janet was singing about her own freaky experiences I don't care what she said in that interview. She was coming out to us in that song.

But, also, Janet has made it a point in her interviews to say that "The Velvet Rope" as a whole can mean many different things to many people. A lot of the themes on the album are left open-ended, so for you "Tonight's The Night" may've been about "bisexuality," but for someone else it could just be a night where the rules between "who" you love are blurred under the guise of darkness.

.
[Edited 5/31/05 12:41pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #163 posted 06/06/05 2:06pm

Janfriend

TurnItUp said:

JANFAN4L said:



nod I do recall this interview.

But, also, Janet has made it a point in her interviews to say that "The Velvet Rope" as a whole can mean many different things to many people. A lot of the themes on the album are left open-ended, so for you "Tonight's The Night" may've been about "bisexuality," but for someone else it could just be a night where the rules between "who" you love are blurred under the guise of darkness.



Ok that answer makes more sense then the last one you made, but this is just my opinion I think she's singing about her own experiences, not saying that she doesn't have friends or acquantances that are like that. No she didn't go back and forth in the song, stead she keeps singing about a girl and then at the end changes to a boy. All I'm saying is if I don't go that way I DEFINITELY would've changed the line to boy instead of girl. When Rod Stewart was singing it he was a guy singing a song about a woman. Janet is a woman that should've been singing the song to a man.

Here's a prime example: For years people have speculated that Luther Vandross is gay, put he has never denied it or confirmed it. On his album titled Songs (a compilation of cover songs)he sang "All the Woman I Need" remaking Whitney Houston's All the Man that I Need. He could've left the song alone and kept it Man that I need, but he didn't he changed it to Woman. Same thing with Whitney folks have speculated over and over that she is a lesbian, but is she singing All the Woman, No, she said Man. Janet was singing about her own freaky experiences I don't care what she said in that interview. She was coming out to us in that song.


.
[Edited 5/31/05 12:41pm]


Luther and Whitney have different audiences and are not into "pushing the envelope" as much as other in the industry

for example, I haven't seen Janet all over women in a video, but I have seen Christian Aguilera get close and personal with girls in her Dirrty video. There are different levels for everyone
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #164 posted 06/07/05 2:40pm

TurnItUp

Janfriend said:

TurnItUp said:




Ok that answer makes more sense then the last one you made, but this is just my opinion I think she's singing about her own experiences, not saying that she doesn't have friends or acquantances that are like that. No she didn't go back and forth in the song, stead she keeps singing about a girl and then at the end changes to a boy. All I'm saying is if I don't go that way I DEFINITELY would've changed the line to boy instead of girl. When Rod Stewart was singing it he was a guy singing a song about a woman. Janet is a woman that should've been singing the song to a man.

Here's a prime example: For years people have speculated that Luther Vandross is gay, put he has never denied it or confirmed it. On his album titled Songs (a compilation of cover songs)he sang "All the Woman I Need" remaking Whitney Houston's All the Man that I Need. He could've left the song alone and kept it Man that I need, but he didn't he changed it to Woman. Same thing with Whitney folks have speculated over and over that she is a lesbian, but is she singing All the Woman, No, she said Man. Janet was singing about her own freaky experiences I don't care what she said in that interview. She was coming out to us in that song.


.
[Edited 5/31/05 12:41pm]


Luther and Whitney have different audiences and are not into "pushing the envelope" as much as other in the industry

for example, I haven't seen Janet all over women in a video, but I have seen Christian Aguilera get close and personal with girls in her Dirrty video. There are different levels for everyone



Just give her time. Unless she has hung up the shock value thing after that
Superbowl episode she will be doing that next on her next video/CD. I hope she won't and will start taking lessons on being a better singer and singing LIVE!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #165 posted 06/07/05 2:56pm

Janfriend

TurnItUp said:

Janfriend said:



Luther and Whitney have different audiences and are not into "pushing the envelope" as much as other in the industry

for example, I haven't seen Janet all over women in a video, but I have seen Christian Aguilera get close and personal with girls in her Dirrty video. There are different levels for everyone



Just give her time. Unless she has hung up the shock value thing after that
Superbowl episode she will be doing that next on her next video/CD. I hope she won't and will start taking lessons on being a better singer and singing LIVE!


She sounds great live, actually.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #166 posted 06/08/05 11:58am

TurnItUp

Janfriend said:

TurnItUp said:




Just give her time. Unless she has hung up the shock value thing after that
Superbowl episode she will be doing that next on her next video/CD. I hope she won't and will start taking lessons on being a better singer and singing LIVE!


She sounds great live, actually.


She sounds great lip-synching. That one concert The Velvet Rope there were a couple of songs she sang live and hit quite a few bad notes. She is a great live performer. She's a dancer. A singer. She is not. That is why I didn't agree with her being the first choice to honor Luther Vandross with the Lifetime achievement award last year. Patti Labelle should've been first choice not second. Patti is in the same category as Luther: a sanger. Janet isn't.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #167 posted 06/08/05 12:03pm

Janfriend

TurnItUp said:

Janfriend said:



She sounds great live, actually.


She sounds great lip-synching. That one concert The Velvet Rope there were a couple of songs she sang live and hit quite a few bad notes. She is a great live performer. She's a dancer. A singer. She is not. That is why I didn't agree with her being the first choice to honor Luther Vandross with the Lifetime achievement award last year. Patti Labelle should've been first choice not second. Patti is in the same category as Luther: a sanger. Janet isn't.


I have heard Janet sing live many times. "That one concert" lol you don't see many of her performances, obviously
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #168 posted 06/08/05 1:44pm

MsLegs

TurnItUp said:

Janfriend said:



She sounds great live, actually.


She sounds great lip-synching. That one concert The Velvet Rope there were a couple of songs she sang live and hit quite a few bad notes. She is a great live performer. She's a dancer. A singer. She is not. That is why I didn't agree with her being the first choice to honor Luther Vandross with the Lifetime achievement award last year. Patti Labelle should've been first choice not second. Patti is in the same category as Luther: a sanger. Janet isn't.

nod I agree with you. Patti is a first rate performer and she dosen't get the props that she is due.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #169 posted 06/08/05 2:19pm

JANFAN4L

disbelief Y'all still on this...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #170 posted 06/08/05 2:25pm

MsLegs

JANFAN4L said:

disbelief Y'all still on this...

lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #171 posted 06/16/05 5:25am

TurnItUp

Janfriend said:

TurnItUp said:



She sounds great lip-synching. That one concert The Velvet Rope there were a couple of songs she sang live and hit quite a few bad notes. She is a great live performer. She's a dancer. A singer. She is not. That is why I didn't agree with her being the first choice to honor Luther Vandross with the Lifetime achievement award last year. Patti Labelle should've been first choice not second. Patti is in the same category as Luther: a sanger. Janet isn't.


I have heard Janet sing live many times. "That one concert" lol you don't see many of her performances, obviously


I have never seen her live in the flesh, but I don't have to cuz I've seen both of those HBO concerts and I'm sure it would've been the same thing live in the flesh, not to mention most of her tv performances. She sings to pre-recorded tapes because she is doing alot of dancing and she is wearing the one thing that most ENTERTAINERS that don't sing live wear, the microphone you wear on the side of your face. Janet can't sing. Her voice isn't much different then it was when she recorded her first album at 16. You notice Prince hardly wears those. He uses the real microphone. The only time I noticed him wearing those was when he was (lol) lip-synching Emancipation on a couple of tv appearances, but NOT HIS LIVE SHOWS.

MsLegs: Thanks for agreeing about Patti Labelle. Most people agreed on that one.
I've got nothing against Janet, but before Luther had that stroke I don't ever remember him hanging around Janet or saying Janet Jackson is one of his influences or he loved her voice. They did that one song "The best things in life are free", which was a wack song to me, and that gives reason to pick Janet over Patti Labelle, a powerhouse singer. Plueeze.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 6 of 6 <123456
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Marques Houston.. Naked banned from BET