independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > The Official Michael Jackson in Court Thread XIV: The Deliberation
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 06/03/05 12:41pm

Marrk

avatar

i'm going to try and chill. i'm a bit agitated, infact i'm a bloody nervous wreck!

pray and a little blunt will get me through the rest of the day.

I'm gonna have to listen to some MJ too. biggrin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 06/03/05 1:03pm

jn2

PANDURITO said:

Cloudbuster said:

50-50


Can you be more specific?
50 yes or 50 no?
I would say 75 (innocent)/25 (guilty)
*
[Edited 6/3/05 13:04pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 06/03/05 1:09pm

Luv4oneanotha

purplecam said:

I've gotta be honest, I won't be shocked if they convict him of molestation. Having said that, I won't be shocked if he gets off on those charges BUT I think they'll get him for the alcohol to minors. I really believe that. Conspiracy charges were blown out of the water before the defense got to try the case. We'll just wait and see.

the charge isn't giving Alcohol to minors
the charge is giving alcohols with intent to abuse minors

In order for the alcohol charge to go through, the molestation charge must go as well






My opinion on what's going to happen?
MJ - Guilty 75%
Mj - Innocent 25%
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 06/03/05 1:12pm

Shapeshifter

avatar

I think he'll be acquitted, and the jury shouldn't take more than a week to return their verdict. I think he's innocent as charged in this instance, but I'm also convinced that he's a paedophile.
There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 06/03/05 1:14pm

jn2

Shapeshifter said:

I think he'll be acquitted, and the jury shouldn't take more than a week to return their verdict. I think he's innocent as charged in this instance, but I'm also convinced that he's a paedophile.
I thought he was one too but not anymore, of course he's not "normal" but that doesn't make him a (children)sexual predator.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 06/03/05 1:14pm

testicleman

Luv4oneanotha said:

purplecam said:

I've gotta be honest, I won't be shocked if they convict him of molestation. Having said that, I won't be shocked if he gets off on those charges BUT I think they'll get him for the alcohol to minors. I really believe that. Conspiracy charges were blown out of the water before the defense got to try the case. We'll just wait and see.

the charge isn't giving Alcohol to minors
the charge is giving alcohols with intent to abuse minors

In order for the alcohol charge to go through, the molestation charge must go as well






My opinion on what's going to happen?
MJ - Guilty 75%
Mj - Innocent 25%


but "giving alcohol with intent to abuse" doesn't include molestation - only the intent, right?

which is why it's considered to be a 'lesser charge'?

i don't actually know what each of the charges are, but surely one can be guilty of giving alcohol with intent to abuse, without being guilty of the actual abuse?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 06/03/05 1:26pm

Luv4oneanotha

testicleman said:

Luv4oneanotha said:


the charge isn't giving Alcohol to minors
the charge is giving alcohols with intent to abuse minors

In order for the alcohol charge to go through, the molestation charge must go as well






My opinion on what's going to happen?
MJ - Guilty 75%
Mj - Innocent 25%


but "giving alcohol with intent to abuse" doesn't include molestation - only the intent, right?

which is why it's considered to be a 'lesser charge'?

i don't actually know what each of the charges are, but surely one can be guilty of giving alcohol with intent to abuse, without being guilty of the actual abuse?


nope

if the molestation goes
the the booz goes...

i believe the formal charge is called "Administering an intoxicating agent to perform lewd , lascivious acts upon a minor"

if it was just Administering an intoxicating agent upon a minor
than he could be pegged with it
but if he's pegged with the molestation
he's getting the booz count

Prosecution should have specified he gave booz to minors not only his victims
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 06/03/05 1:45pm

BoOTyLiCioUs

I just heard from the MJ boards that the verdict is being announced today.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 06/03/05 2:02pm

Luv4oneanotha

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

I just heard from the MJ boards that the verdict is being announced today.

can see the headlines now
"Wacko Jacko Guilty of Child Molestation"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 06/03/05 2:08pm

calldapplwonde
ry83

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

I just heard from the MJ boards that the verdict is being announced today.



Hmmm, I guess that's a good sign. Just wonder how the MJ boards would know this?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 06/03/05 2:15pm

Luv4oneanotha

calldapplwondery83 said:

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

I just heard from the MJ boards that the verdict is being announced today.



Hmmm, I guess that's a good sign. Just wonder how the MJ boards would know this?


oh you didn't know?
Mj fans have Prescience
they are certified Psychics...


Call me now for a free reading!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 06/03/05 2:18pm

sag10

avatar

This is nerve wracking.

I hope for an acquittal.

I see this family as being so conniving, and street wise.. It is so sad
for me to see a Latino family do this.

If I were a juror I couldn't in good faith convict a man with so many inconsistencies, and lies.. Doubt is be so strong in my soul.
^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^
Being happy doesn't mean that everything is perfect, it means you've decided to look beyond the imperfections... unknown
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 06/03/05 2:57pm

Lleena

avatar

Just a question, If he is found guilty, was he set up? or did he do it? I think the verdict seems to be irrelevant, people have made their minds up already. It's not irrelevant to him of course or his family or the boys family but it does seem that way to the public at large.

.....
[Edited 6/3/05 15:03pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 06/03/05 3:09pm

Luv4oneanotha

Lleena said:

Just a question, If he is found guilty, was he set up? or did he do it? I think the verdict seems to be irrelevant, people have made their minds up already. It's not irrelevant to him of course or his family or the boys family but it does seem that way to the public at large.

.....
[Edited 6/3/05 15:03pm]

your correct!

im at a crossroads now,

I don't think Mj's Innocent nor guilty anymore
im not satisfied...
i think all biasness has left me

both sides proved nothing

i think their should be a mistrial and both sides need to investigate the case deeper
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 06/03/05 3:12pm

Lleena

avatar

Luv4oneanotha said:

Lleena said:

Just a question, If he is found guilty, was he set up? or did he do it? I think the verdict seems to be irrelevant, people have made their minds up already. It's not irrelevant to him of course or his family or the boys family but it does seem that way to the public at large.

.....
[Edited 6/3/05 15:03pm]

your correct!

im at a crossroads now,

I don't think Mj's Innocent nor guilty anymore
im not satisfied...
i think all biasness has left me

both sides proved nothing

i think their should be a mistrial and both sides need to investigate the case deeper



I think people are either convinced of his guilt, or his innocence. Some think like you and are unsure, but few do. The prosecution didn't provide any conclusive evidence and the burden was on them to prove guilt. However, the defence didn't seem too convincing either..
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 06/03/05 3:25pm

sag10

avatar

Lleena said:

Just a question, If he is found guilty, was he set up? or did he do it? I think the verdict seems to be irrelevant, people have made their minds up already. It's not irrelevant to him of course or his family or the boys family but it does seem that way to the public at large.

.....
[Edited 6/3/05 15:03pm]


Good point.

Lleena this boys mom reminds me of the stalker.. No lie.
^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^
Being happy doesn't mean that everything is perfect, it means you've decided to look beyond the imperfections... unknown
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 06/03/05 3:39pm

Annastesia22

I think people are forgetting this is the third boy to accuse him of this ,two others boys were paid to not bring him to court ..i just hope he finds help whatever the outcome is and he needs to stay away from young boys .
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 06/03/05 3:53pm

Luv4oneanotha

Annastesia22 said:

I think people are forgetting this is the third boy to accuse him of this ,two others boys were paid to not bring him to court ..i just hope he finds help whatever the outcome is and he needs to stay away from young boys .


3 boys

2 formal accusations


all 3 of them can be easily discredited



seriously if your gonna post here you need to look up your facts


but back to your point

It would make sense, if in fact there were more victims
Pedophiles victimize hundreds of children within a lifetime

and Jackson certainly has access to thousands of children
shouldn't there be more victims...

ahh wait hush money...

mmm paying off 20 million a peice no wonder he's broke1

there is not much logic in that...


its also ironic that all three of the children that accuse him have had shady past...

Its a very simple equation once you find a weakness...
you aim directly for it...

i learned that while percieving the MJ sextape scandle years ago...
MJ has money and an open weakness...
its fairly simple to capitalize on it...

like this fool now who's suing him because MJ kidnapped him and abused him physically and sexually
physically as in battered and bruised him...

we get a mistrial
Lets hunt down Jordy Chandler
Lets get Brett Barnes
Lets get jordy's Father Evan!

and see wtf is going down
cause i seriously wan't to know if this man is guilty or not
and so far

i don't know!
which is F8cking sad after 14 weeks or trial
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 06/03/05 3:56pm

Annastesia22

Luv4oneanotha said:

Annastesia22 said:

I think people are forgetting this is the third boy to accuse him of this ,two others boys were paid to not bring him to court ..i just hope he finds help whatever the outcome is and he needs to stay away from young boys .


3 boys

2 formal accusations


all 3 of them can be easily discredited



seriously if your gonna post here you need to look up your facts


but back to your point

It would make sense, if in fact there were more victims
Pedophiles victimize hundreds of children within a lifetime

and Jackson certainly has access to thousands of children
shouldn't there be more victims...

ahh wait hush money...

mmm paying off 20 million a peice no wonder he's broke1

there is not much logic in that...


its also ironic that all three of the children that accuse him have had shady past...

Its a very simple equation once you find a weakness...
you aim directly for it...

i learned that while percieving the MJ sextape scandle years ago...
MJ has money and an open weakness...
its fairly simple to capitalize on it...

like this fool now who's suing him because MJ kidnapped him and abused him physically and sexually
physically as in battered and bruised him...

we get a mistrial
Lets hunt down Jordy Chandler
Lets get Brett Barnes
Lets get jordy's Father Evan!

and see wtf is going down
cause i seriously wan't to know if this man is guilty or not
and so far

i don't know!
which is F8cking sad after 14 weeks or trial
Yeah he paid off two boys i know the facts ,i also know he likes little boys neutral its not funny he has a problem
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 06/03/05 3:59pm

Luv4oneanotha

Annastesia22 said:

Luv4oneanotha said:



3 boys

2 formal accusations


all 3 of them can be easily discredited



seriously if your gonna post here you need to look up your facts


but back to your point

It would make sense, if in fact there were more victims
Pedophiles victimize hundreds of children within a lifetime

and Jackson certainly has access to thousands of children
shouldn't there be more victims...

ahh wait hush money...

mmm paying off 20 million a peice no wonder he's broke1

there is not much logic in that...


its also ironic that all three of the children that accuse him have had shady past...

Its a very simple equation once you find a weakness...
you aim directly for it...

i learned that while percieving the MJ sextape scandle years ago...
MJ has money and an open weakness...
its fairly simple to capitalize on it...

like this fool now who's suing him because MJ kidnapped him and abused him physically and sexually
physically as in battered and bruised him...

we get a mistrial
Lets hunt down Jordy Chandler
Lets get Brett Barnes
Lets get jordy's Father Evan!

and see wtf is going down
cause i seriously wan't to know if this man is guilty or not
and so far

i don't know!
which is F8cking sad after 14 weeks or trial
Yeah he paid off two boys i know the facts ,i also know he likes little boys neutral its not funny he has a problem


i mean who seriously doesn't like little boys?
Little girls suck!

they're boring (no offence to yall females)

when you wan't bonding you go to males Duh!
that still doesn't mean he's a molester

got anything else?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 06/03/05 4:06pm

Annastesia22

Luv4oneanotha said:

Annastesia22 said:

Yeah he paid off two boys i know the facts ,i also know he likes little boys neutral its not funny he has a problem


i mean who seriously doesn't like little boys?
Little girls suck!

they're boring (no offence to yall females)

when you wan't bonding you go to males Duh!
that still doesn't mean he's a molester

got anything else?

Oh please look at what you just posted ,really thats all you can think of little girls suck ..he is 46 let him bond with adults
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 06/03/05 4:12pm

Luv4oneanotha

Annastesia22 said:

Luv4oneanotha said:



i mean who seriously doesn't like little boys?
Little girls suck!

they're boring (no offence to yall females)

when you wan't bonding you go to males Duh!
that still doesn't mean he's a molester

got anything else?

Oh please look at what you just posted ,really thats all you can think of little girls suck ..he is 46 let him bond with adults

hey if im lying im dying...
Little girls suck!

and perhaps if he connected with adults he'd bond with them as well

Adults Judge first before showing any type of compassion
its the opposite with kids

Plus kids are funner than adults, i love hanging out with my cousins and their friends
brings me back to my childhood

maybe you should go watch Willy Wonka and The chocolate Factory

in speaking maybe Willy Wonka was based after a pedophile...
[Edited 6/3/05 16:12pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 06/03/05 4:41pm

krayzie

avatar

Really, I truly believe Mike is not guilty..

The charges are too big to seem "real", and the proofs don't exist...
I don't see why Mike will be find guilty...

Do you really believe that Michael Jackson molested this boy ?
Com'on, it's too big...

I don't believe it, and a lot of people don't believe either...

If he's found guilty I will be shocked...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 06/03/05 5:05pm

Lleena

avatar

sag10 said:

Lleena said:

Just a question, If he is found guilty, was he set up? or did he do it? I think the verdict seems to be irrelevant, people have made their minds up already. It's not irrelevant to him of course or his family or the boys family but it does seem that way to the public at large.

.....
[Edited 6/3/05 15:03pm]


Good point.

Lleena this boys mom reminds me of the stalker.. No lie.



really? That is scary eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 06/03/05 5:16pm

Lleena

avatar

I seriously doubt Willy Wonka EVER shared his bed with Charlie....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 06/03/05 7:34pm

sinisterpentat
onic

Lleena said:

I seriously doubt Willy Wonka EVER shared his bed with Charlie....


whatchoo doing in this forum?!?

GIT (no pun intended smile ) yo butt back to GD!!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 06/03/05 9:06pm

Luv4oneanotha

Lleena said:

I seriously doubt Willy Wonka EVER shared his bed with Charlie....


Of course not

he already shares his bed with the Oompa Loompas!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 06/03/05 10:22pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

SpcMs said:



Janet looking mmm... different.


Janet needs a hug for eating more. I love it!!!
[Edited 6/3/05 22:23pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 06/03/05 10:24pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

krayzie said:

Really, I truly believe Mike is not guilty..

The charges are too big to seem "real", and the proofs don't exist...
I don't see why Mike will be find guilty...

Do you really believe that Michael Jackson molested this boy ?
Com'on, it's too big...

I don't believe it, and a lot of people don't believe either...

If he's found guilty I will be shocked...


Michael got screw!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 06/04/05 1:46am

TheFrog

Luv4oneanotha said:

testicleman said:



but "giving alcohol with intent to abuse" doesn't include molestation - only the intent, right?

which is why it's considered to be a 'lesser charge'?

i don't actually know what each of the charges are, but surely one can be guilty of giving alcohol with intent to abuse, without being guilty of the actual abuse?


nope

if the molestation goes
the the booz goes...

i believe the formal charge is called "Administering an intoxicating agent to perform lewd , lascivious acts upon a minor"

if it was just Administering an intoxicating agent upon a minor
than he could be pegged with it
but if he's pegged with the molestation
he's getting the booz count

Prosecution should have specified he gave booz to minors not only his victims


hmm

no, they were the original charges filed. i thought the whole point of the discussions a couple of days ago was that the judge in his directions would allow the jury to find MJ guilty of a 'lesser charge' of administering alcohol without the need for there to be the lewd acts too. confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > The Official Michael Jackson in Court Thread XIV: The Deliberation